Explore products and resources
PricingIntegrationsReduce legal and accessibility risk with a practical website accessibility audit. We test real user journeys across keyboard, screen reader, forms, and critical flows, then deliver a prioritized remediation plan aligned to WCAG 2.2, EN 301 549, and EAA.
Automated tools can flag many issues, but only a manual website accessibility audit confirms what real users experience. Our expert review covers keyboard access, focus order, screen reader output, form behavior, and critical business journeys in context.
Ideal for teams that need a manual WCAG audit with clear evidence for remediation, procurement, and compliance reporting.
Automated scans are fast and useful, but they can miss the issues people actually experience. A manual website accessibility audit checks keyboard flow, screen reader behavior, focus order, and error handling in context.
The strongest approach combines both: automated testing for scale and expert review for confidence, clarity, and action-ready evidence.
You receive a focused summary of what is blocking accessibility, what should be fixed first, and how to justify the work to stakeholders. We also provide a completed Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) based on the VPAT® 2.5 template, available on request.
No vague findings. Just actionable priorities, technical clarity, and audit-ready evidence.
Each audit gives your team clarity, reduces risk, and helps you improve accessibility with a prioritized roadmap.
Clarity around major risks
Validation beyond automation
Prioritized recommendations
Completed Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) based on VPAT® 2.5
In practice, teams use both terms for the same goal: evaluating whether a website meets WCAG requirements and where users hit accessibility barriers. The key decision is not the phrase, it is whether your audit includes manual expert verification.
Automated accessibility testing is useful for speed and scale, but it cannot catch every barrier a real user will hit. Manual review helps confirm keyboard flow, screen reader behavior, focus order, and error handling in context.
The strongest website accessibility audits use both methods: automated checks for coverage and manual testing for confidence, clarity, and actionable remediation.
Need continuous monitoring between manual reviews? Run recurring checks with our accessibility scanner and WCAG Color Contrast Checker.
Automation finds patterns. A manual web audit confirms what blocks real users, what to fix first, and how to present evidence to legal, procurement, and engineering stakeholders.
Confirm whether critical journeys are genuinely usable for keyboard and screen reader users.
Prioritize fixes by severity, business impact, and effort instead of chasing every minor issue.
Reduce rework by catching design and development issues before a launch, lawsuit, or regulator review.
Create clear evidence for compliance, procurement, and remediation planning with audit-ready reporting.
In most projects, they refer to the same process. A manual web audit is a website accessibility audit that evaluates your pages against WCAG criteria and documents findings with remediation priorities.
A manual website accessibility audit is an expert evaluation of real user experience, including keyboard operation, screen reader behavior, and task completion. It is needed because automated checks cannot fully validate context, intent, or usability outcomes.
You receive prioritized findings, clear fix guidance, and a completed ACR based on VPAT 2.5, available on request, to support procurement, compliance, and stakeholder reporting.
Define the pages and journeys in scope, include your current templates and components, collect known accessibility issues, and assign owners for remediation decisions before kickoff.